Initial work has been done to map the responsible data landscape and to begin developing tools and strategies for meeting responsible data challenges. Checklists, draft policies primers are being developed, with a focus on issues as diverse as open government, human rights surveys, and humanitarian data sharing. We’ve been working with partners in-country, but Budapest will be our first opportunity to bring a significant number of people from the front lines of data-driven advocacy, to review these tools and strategies in collaborative working groups. There are a number of tools and strategies already in the works, and we’ll be surfacing more during the event. Sessions throughout the two days were structured to move collaborative work from discovery, to review, to production. The objective of the event was to map, refine and produce useful and usable responsible resources.
Outputs that were developed, modified or built-upon included:
- Newbie Guide on Selecting Hosting Providers: This guide will help you navigate the process of selecting a hosting provider for your website.
- Why Should My NGO Care About Responsible Data? This reference sheet includes a definition of ‘responsible data’ and incentives (carrots and sticks) for NGOs to care about it.
- Responsible Data Visualization: A list of questions and considerations when designing your data visualizations to help you recognize and avoid bias and misrepresentation.
- Messaging Matrix to Advocate for Responsible Data: This framework helps you craft appropriate messaging to advocate for responsible data. This framework is in the format of a matrix that helps you identify responsible data incentives depending on your target audience.
- Developing Consent Policies: This framework includes a rationale for why consent is worthwhile and necessary, and a checklist for developing appropriate consent policies and practices.
- Atomized Security Plan for Organizations: This resource is a set of checklists that attempt to list all of the possible information security steps an organization can take to protect itself.
- Resource Creator Manifesto: This declaration contains a series of of values and commitments for resource-creators.
- De-identification Suggestions: This framework helps you identify what data should be de-identified, and how to do it.
- Data in the Project Lifecycle: A lightweight tool for data project implementers to help plan their projects and check whether they are being responsible with their data at every step, both for planned and emerging risks.
- Data Risk Checker: A project design tool for assessing potential harms associated with specific data points. This resource provides a framework to better understand the risks to the people reflected in your data. This tool is meant to inform mitigation and protection strategies.
- Tools for Online Collaboration: Guidance on different types of collaborative software, factoring in responsible data principles.
Information and data are an increasingly important part of advocacy work, and intentionally or not, activists and civil society groups are collecting a lot of it—through surveys, mappings, record keeping and every day communications. And while data and communication tools can strengthen advocacy work, they can also put communities and activists at risk if they are not managed carefully and responsibly.
The Responsible Data Forum kicked off in Oakland, California in March 2014, producing prototypes for tools and strategies, a list of issues for further attention, and partnerships to carry this work forward. Since then we’ve been partnering with allies to organize issue-driven events, including Fora on responsible hosting, international development programming, accessing corporate data and more. We’re using these focused events, and direct engagement with our partners, to better understand how responsible data challenges manifest themselves in national advocacy, and to refine the tools and strategies that we’ve been working towards so far.
Budapest aimed to bring this all together, convening trainers, researchers, security thinkers and other international support actors, together with the people working on the front lines of data-driven advocacy, to consider what we’ve learned and what we’ve built so far.