Responsible data considerations for open source investigation in human rights

As the use of open source data in human rights research proliferates, new methods and increased availability of data are raising responsible data challenges.

In advance of the Responsible Data Forum on Open Source Investigation for Human Rights, held in partnership with Meedan at the Stockholm Internet Forum on Tuesday, May 16, we compiled a list of resources that can help human rights researchers respond to responsible data challenges when using open source data. 

Digital data and human rights research

Over the past few years, the use of open source data for human rights investigations has grown around the world. Large human rights organisations such as Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch have spearheaded this trend through projects such as Amnesty’s reporting on the 2015 Boko Haram attack on Baga (Nigeria) with satellite imagery, which received international media coverage. More recently, both local and international human rights organisations, as well as international media, have analysed the chemical attack on Khan Sheikhoun (Syria) with user-generated data (content created by users of a system that is publicly available on that system). The possibilities for finding and acquiring data to assist in documenting human rights violations are ever-growing, but the most ethical way of dealing with this secondary data is not always clear.

At the same time, many smaller organisations in countries such as Syria, Ukraine, and South Africa are also using digital methods to collect and verify user-generated data, while citizen journalism is gaining in popularity as initiatives such as Bellingcat produce stellar evidence-based reports.

Responsible data challenges

But as the demand and possibilities for open source investigation in human rights continue to grow, we need to consider responsible data issues around data collection, data verification, legal challenges and vicarious trauma (trauma suffered by human rights workers after exposure to traumatic eyewitness media).

See the resources below for more:

Data collection

Data verification

  • The Verification Handbook is a comprehensive guide on the possibilities and challenges of content verification.
  • The Tow Center’s study on user-generated content includes a chapter on responsibility to the audience.  
  • The number of tools that can help researchers to verify sources are countless; this toolbox, created by the Citizen Evidence Lab and available in ten languages, is great starting point for anyone interested in learning about content verification.
  • First Draft News has produced a guide on visual verification of photos and videos.

Vicarious trauma

Further reading

This compilation is non-exhaustive, but we hope it can spark a conversation around responsible data challenges for open source investigations in human rights. The outcome of this Responsible Data Forum will be a series of responsible data considerations and challenges for human rights advocates and researchers who work on open source investigations. 

Sign up to the Responsible Data mailing list to be kept up to date on further developments on this topic.

This can help you with: Sharing Data
Issue areas: No categories

Comments (1)

  1. Online Tercüme (reply)

    19 June 2017 at 6:28 am

    More research on human rights should be made. Because the most crucial assets in the world, people who are at the beginning of the persecution must be prevented. There is no living thing to see in this world. Like a promise of Mevlana. Come anyway, no matter what.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Time limit is exhausted. Please reload the CAPTCHA.

Published on: 16 May
Discussion: 1 Comment